President Bola Tinubu faces growing criticism from opposition parties over his reported decision not to campaign across all 36 states ahead of the 2027 Nigerian presidential election. The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has accused him of showing fear of facing voters, suggesting his absence from key regions undermines his legitimacy. The ADC Presidential Campaign Council claims his strategy reflects contempt for the electorate and may weaken his chances of re-election.
The criticism comes as the ADC’s campaign team highlights Tinubu’s limited public appearances, which they argue fail to engage with diverse voter bases. Opposition leaders argue that such a strategy risks alienating potential supporters and appears disengaged from the political realities of the country. Meanwhile, Tinubu’s allies within the All Progressives Congress (APC) remain confident, declaring that his rivals—Atiku, Obi, Duke, and Makinde—lack the capability to challenge him effectively.
This political tension follows a broader pattern of electoral strategy debates in Nigeria, where candidates often face scrutiny over their campaign methods. Tinubu’s decision to focus on urban centers rather than rural areas has sparked discussions about the inclusivity of his approach. As the 2027 election approaches, the debate over campaign engagement is likely to intensify, with both sides vying for public support through contrasting strategies.
